Showing posts with label Mitt Romney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mitt Romney. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

NEWT''S PROMISING THE MOON DID NOT WORK

Thank God Floridians recognized the “promised anything to anyone” liberal Gingrich, falsely claiming to be conservative. He promised the Moon, offered open marriage, amnesty to undocumenteds, move embassy to Jerusalem, rules don’t apply to him, refused to work as a student…

Thank God the Floridians did not buy his BS. 

Although Romney is not a moderate, he is little right to the moderate and can work as President. We need more moderates like Romney in governance. After all, moderates make up more than 90% of our country.

Mike Ghouse
Political commentator
www.MikeGhouse.net 

Thursday, January 19, 2012

SOUTH CAROLILNA DEBATE – JAN 19, 2012


Romney remained poised, he appeals to reason.
Gingrich delivers applause, he appeals to the moment
Santorum clamours for recognition, he appeals to the moment
Paul has the best message, he expects people to think freely

Romney will win the South Carolina Vote on Saturday.
Closing remarks by Romney focuses on our inalienable rights and I loved it, it is part of the mission of our organization - America Together Foundation.

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

ROMNEY QUOTED QURAAN LAST NIGHT

Exactly one hour into debate, Romney said, " wherever you find the enemies, you find and kill them." I tweeted to Bret Baier, but he was flooded with the information.  We covered that extensively in the Quraan Conference? Quraan means exactly what Romney meant. 

Monday, January 16, 2012

SOUTH CAROLINA DEBATE


Romney could have nailed Gingrich, when Gingrich suggested Romney to tell his super Pac to cut the ads, Romney went through a series of questions – and Gingrich said it was illegal to tell the pacs… then Romney should have asked – are you telling me to do the illegal thing? Instead the gentleman suggested you and I are in the same boat – If Gingrich was on the other side, he would have buried Romney. You should have seen the relief on Gingrich’s face for not getting slaughtered. Gingrich was vulnerable and Romney either missed it or he was too much of a gentleman.

Romney is still ahead. He sticks to the topic and does not jump to deliver cheap applause lines like Gingrich.

Gingrich delivers applause lines, no substance. Audiences are conditioned to boo or clap – and not to think.  Gingrich demeans the unemployed that they can find a job – where are jobs?
 
Paul always makes sense; he could be forceful and gain the support.
 
Santorum was good, but like Gingrich, he demeaning the people who don’t have a job, as if they are lazy or dumb.

Perry- was good in a few instances, but an embarrassment, get the hell out of the race man.

An hour into the conversation – Both Gingrich and Romney were saying; wherever you find the enemies find and kill them. Interesting dialogue!

Mike Ghouse is committed to building a cohesive America and offers pluralistic solutions on issues of the day. www.MikeGhouse.net

Saturday, January 14, 2012

GOOFY RIGHT-WINGERS MAY HELP ROMNEY

Goofy right wingers may help Romney with their divisiveness, they want their candidate to win, but all they do is opposite of what they want to do. It's like security for Israel, the goofy right wingers do the opposite to deny Israel it's security and justice to Palestinians, they do the same with Iran, causing Iran to dig in their heels.

- - - - -
Mike Ghouse is committed to building a cohesive America and offers pluralistic solutions on issues of the day. A writer, thinker and a speaker and is available to speak on pluralism, politics, islam, peace, cohesive societies and a variety of topics. Check out 4 websites and 27 Blogs indexed at www.MikeGhouse.net. Current articles at www.TheGhousediary.com

Thursday, January 12, 2012

TEXAS FAITH: Evangelical leaders finding an alternative to Romney

The Dallas Morning News' Wayne Slater and Texas Faith moderator Wayne Slater reported last week that a group of prominent conservative evangelical leaders are gathering at a Texas ranch this weekend to decide about a candidate they could unite behind as an alternative to Mitt Romney.
The invited include James Dobson of Focus on the Family, Richard Land of the Southern Baptist Convention, Christian Zionist pastor John Hagee, Kelly Shackelford of the Liberty Institute and Don Wildmon of the American Family Association. Southern Baptist leader Paul Pressler is hosting them. With that as the background, here is this week's question:

If you were invited to join other religious leaders in coalescing behind a candidate, would you attend?
Ten Texas Faith panelists respond to the question in Dallas Morning News, here is my response:

MIKE GHOUSE, President, Foundation for Pluralism, Dallas
Yes, I would attend.

If they are considering endorsing a candidate for the presidency of the United States and possibly inviting me, it becomes my responsibility to attend and be a part of the decision making in agreeing with them or asserting a nay, regardless of the outcome.

To disengage ourselves from people we don’t agree with is to give them a tacit approval to go ahead with their plans; by refusing to attend we are giving them a reason to dig in their heels.

Can the Pastor of a Church publicly endorse a candidate without influencing or dividing his or her congregation? Is that a fine line that blurs the separation of Church and state?

The wise men have said it all along, bad things happen in the society not (exclusively) because of bad people, but because good people do nothing about it. I do not want to abdicate my responsibility of speaking up.

No American needs to beg for approval if he or she is qualified, I may or may not vote for Romney but I will stand up for his right to contest and the right to serve our nation. The qualifications and abilities of the candidate should matter to us and not his faith,

The evangelicals rightfully condemn the persecution of Christians in Egypt, Indonesia, Pakistan, Israel, China, India, Sudan and elsewhere, and as Americans we have rightfully condemned all of that plus the persecution of Baha’is, Zoroastrians, Jews, Hindus, Wicca, Sikhs, Buddhists, Pagans, Ahmadiyya, Shia and other Muslims in other parts of the world.

Should we not be ashamed of our duplicity towards Mormons, Muslims and Gay communities in America? What message are we sending to the bigoted nations out there? Do more of what they do? Are we worth emulating?

To push Romney aside for his faith is Anti-American, bigoted and unpatriotic, at least that seems to be the intention of the six individuals gathering up.

We need to be a part of the society and not let a whimsical few run our nation. Indeed, I will attend and speak up for a cohesive America where no American has to live in discomfort, apprehension or fear of the other.

Wasn’t that what Jesus wanted? Isn’t that what Americans want?

# # #
To view all the 12 opinions, please visit Dallas Morning News link - http://religionblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2012/01/texas-faith-evangelical-leader.html

- - - - -
Mike Ghouse is committed to building a cohesive America and offers pluralistic solutions on issues of the day. A writer, thinker and a speaker and is available to speak on pluralism, politics, Islam, peace, cohesive societies and a variety of topics. Check out 4 websites and 27 Blogs indexed at www.MikeGhouse.net. Current articles at
www.TheGhousediary.com

Friday, January 6, 2012

A Muslim's Republican Experience


I am a Republican and a moderate one, and invariably someone or the other makes comments that the term "Moderate Republican" is Oxymoron. We come in all colors, shapes and intensities. A majority of Republicans are indeed moderates, just like any majority in any group out there, religiously, ethnically, racially or otherwise. We want to get along and live our own life and wish well to others. I must however admit that we are effing chickens, we have no guts to speak out when we see or hear reckless speeches by our party leadership and ironically in the freedom party you find too many conformists.

The McCains don't realize that when you threaten others, you are not secure any more, as others would be equally committed to defend themselves and probably attack you in your vulnerable moments. It is a bad approach.


Mike Ghouse is committed to building a cohesive America and offers pluralistic solutions on issues of the day. A writer, thinker and a speaker. (214) 325-1916 - www.MikeGhouse.net

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

IOWA REPUBLICAN CAUCUS NOTES


Romney and Paul are relatively a safe bet against Obama; most certainly Ron Paul will be a bigger challenge to Obama than Romney. Rick Santorum earned 5 more votes than Romney in the final tally in the Iowa Caucus. Santorum will not make it, he is a right winger shamelessly wearing a conservative badge, he will take our nation to the brink of disaster thorugh war mongering mind set.

Michelle Bachman is an embarrassment, she does not see the writing on the wall, and at least Rick Perry has seen it. Gingrich will be an embarrassment to our nation; he acts as though he will not be caught by saying one thing to you and the other to me even here in Iowa he goofed up.

I hope Bachman, Perry, Gingrich and Huntsman will drop out of the race so we can hear more vigorous debates from Romney and Paul. We need candidates who are inclusive and good for America, every one of the inhabitants of America. We are one nation under God with liberty and Justice for all.

Mike Ghouse committed to a cohesive America and offers pluralistic solutions on issues of the day. www.MikeGhouse.net 
....

Latest: 
Glad things changed from early announcements to this "Mitt Romney eked out a minuscule 8-vote victory over Rick Santorum in Iowa's Republican presidential caucuses on Tuesday night, bringing down the curtain on an improbable first act in the campaign to pick a challenger to President Barack Obama for next fall. "

Monday, December 5, 2011

Republican desperation for candidates

POLLS: GINGRICH & ROMNEY ACCEPTABLE GOP CANDIDATES

The integrity of Gingrich is questionable but the Republicans are desperate to have anything that speaks. That is a big compromise to the tea parties, it shows that tea party's influence is very limited despite the loud mouthing. Obama has a chance to make it, if he has the balls to push the Jobs bill and do the right thing for the nation, leave a legacy before he goes anyway, rather than go down in history as good for nothing president.
Sixty-two percent called Gingrich an "acceptable" GOP nominee, while 54 percent called Romney "acceptable." (Thirty-four percent called Gingrich unacceptable, and 41 percent said the same of Romney.) While those figures are higher than any of the other Republican presidential candidates, it's worth noting that less than two-thirds sees either man as an acceptable nominee.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57336963-503544/poll-gingrich-romney-only-acceptable-candidates-to-gop-voters/

Friday, December 2, 2011

Gingrich next exit, Romney has to contend with Paul

CAIN GONE, GINGRICH NEXT - ROMNEY AND PAUL NOW


The only candidate that is holding on to the principles of GOP is Ron Paul. He said “the loyalty to my country comes first and the party next” I wrote the same phrase in 2007 and again in 2008 asking the Republicans to put America first.

Now Gingrich will be made to acknowledge things that he did not volunteer, he was not faithful to his wife nor will he pass the standards he “talks” about as a hypocrite, and he will fail the integrity. My article will be out next week. As of now, if all things go well it would be between Romney and Paul unless someone surprises.

Cain should have gone gracefully; he would have earned the respect of the country, but he blew it, under the fake garb of conservatism he ran but ran out of steam. Palin, no way! It is time for the GOP to save some more embarrassment or let the process purge itself. Where is Perry? I am glad at least I remembered him; he is the Governor of my State.

Mike Ghouse
A Moderate, but not a silent Republican